Arabic Speech-to-Text Comparison

Deepgram Nova-3vsSpeechmatics

Head-to-head comparison based on real production benchmarks with Gulf Arabic callers.

Overview

Deepgram Nova-3

Recommended

Best-in-class Arabic STT with ultra-low latency. Production-tested winner.

production testednova-3

Speechmatics

Not Recommended

Ultra-fast Arabic STT with poor transcription quality.

production testedstandard

Latency

Deepgram Nova-3

Avg EOU Delay424ms
Best Case0ms
Worst Case815ms
Full turn time: 787ms–3821ms

Speechmatics

Avg EOU Delay460ms
Best Case0ms
Worst Case806ms

Quality

Deepgram Nova-3

Excellent

Accurately captures Gulf Arabic phrases. No user repetitions needed in production calls.

Gulf ArabicMSASaudi Arabic

Speechmatics

Poor

Users had to repeat themselves frequently. Quality unacceptable for production use.

MSA

Features

FeatureDeepgram Nova-3Speechmatics
Real-time streaming transcription
Automatic language detection
Endpointing / end-of-utterance detection
Punctuation and formatting
Word-level timestamps
Custom vocabulary
Multichannel support
Configurable endpointing
Standard and enhanced operating points
Custom dictionary

Pricing

Deepgram Nova-3

Free tier
Pay As You GoNova-3 streaming
$0.0043per minute
GrowthVolume discount
$0.0036per minute

Speechmatics

Free tier
StandardReal-time streaming
$0.0042per minute

Streaming & Integration

CapabilityDeepgram Nova-3Speechmatics
Streaming support
LiveKit plugin
Self-hostable
API styleWebSocket streaming + RESTWebSocket streaming + REST
SDKsPython, Node.js, Go, .NET, RustPython, Node.js

Verdict

Recommended

Deepgram Nova-3

The clear winner for Arabic STT. Deepgram Nova-3 delivers excellent quality at 424ms average EOU delay — fast enough for real-time voice agents.

Choose Deepgram Nova-3 if you need:

  • Production Arabic voice agents
  • Low-latency real-time transcription
  • Gulf Arabic dialects
Pros
  • +Best latency-to-quality ratio for Arabic
  • +75% faster than nearest competitor (Soniox)
  • +LiveKit plugin available
  • +Generous free tier ($200 credit)
  • +Excellent Gulf Arabic accuracy
Cons
  • -Cloud-only (no self-hosting)
  • -Pricing can scale with high volume
Not Recommended

Speechmatics

Amazingly fast but Arabic quality is too poor for production. The speed advantage is meaningless when users have to repeat themselves.

Choose Speechmatics if you need:

  • Speed-only use cases where quality doesn't matter
Pros
  • +Lightning-fast endpointing (0-460ms)
  • +Self-hosting option available
  • +Configurable latency/quality tradeoff
Cons
  • -Poor Arabic transcription quality
  • -Users had to repeat themselves
  • -Quality issues negate speed advantage

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is faster for Arabic speech-to-text, Deepgram Nova-3 or Speechmatics?

Deepgram Nova-3 is faster with an average end-of-utterance delay of 424ms, which is 36ms faster than Speechmatics.

Which has better Arabic transcription quality, Deepgram Nova-3 or Speechmatics?

Deepgram Nova-3 has a quality rating of 5/5 (Excellent). Accurately captures Gulf Arabic phrases. No user repetitions needed in production calls.

Is Deepgram Nova-3 or Speechmatics better for production voice agents?

Deepgram Nova-3 is recommended for production use. The clear winner for Arabic STT. Deepgram Nova-3 delivers excellent quality at 424ms average EOU delay — fast enough for real-time voice agents.

How does Deepgram Nova-3 pricing compare to Speechmatics?

Deepgram Nova-3 starts at $0.0043 per minute (Nova-3 streaming). Speechmatics starts at $0.0042 per minute (Real-time streaming).